This course builds on the foundational subjects Australian Public Law and Commonwealth Constitutional Law. The course examines constitutional law in greater depth, with a particular focus on how Australia and other democracies use both written and unwritten constitutional law to regulate the democratic process, including elections, referendums, parliaments, and political parties.

A central theme of the course is the use of law to improve the practice of democratic politics. Students will explore efforts to make politics less partisan, fairer and more equal, more rational, and more democratic, as well as the extent to which such legal interventions have succeeded or created new challenges. Comparative analysis will enable students to evaluate whether alternative constitutional systems for regulating democracy have been effective overseas and whether they could be adapted to the Australian context.

To develop their knowledge and skills, students will engage in a range of learning activities. The seminar format will be a mixture of discussion and lecture-style presentation. Discussions will centre, in part, around informal student ‘Responses’ to readings. Seminars will be punctuated by hands-on 'demonstrations' giving concrete illustrations of the themes we will discuss. Typically, at least one demonstration is included in each class. For instance, students will experiment with ‘gerrymandering’ to manipulate a hypothetical electoral system. The course also features visiting speakers, including leading lawyers and senior government officials, who provide insight into real-world applications of the material.

 

Learning Outcomes

Upon successful completion, students will have the knowledge and skills to:

1. Critically analyse and evaluate how constitutional law shapes democracy and democratic institutions in Australia, and compare and contrast these frameworks with systems in other countries.
2. Examine problems raised by the use of constitutional law to regulate democratic institutions, including partisan battles over the interpretation of legal rules, and the often-elusive search for neutral decision-makers and propose alternative solutions.
3. Evaluate how national or state political culture and unwritten constitutional norms play a role in shaping democracy and democratic institutions, and in turn how constitutional laws and institutions help shape political culture and norms.
4. Investigate and synthesise advanced knowledge of the constitutional laws impacting on elections, voting, political finance, parliament, and political parties, and critique those laws in terms of democratic strengths and deficits.
5. Critically analyse and evaluate which aspects of constitutional law are most relevant to issues of political partisanship and political system fairness.
6. Plan and execute research in an area of constitutional law relevant to the themes covered in the course and communicate ideas and findings in written and oral formats.

Research-Led Teaching

Our advanced study of constitutional law in this course will focus on whether constitutional law and practice can serve as tools to improve Australia's (and other countries') social and political conditions; to resolve deep conflicts between groups; and generally to generate better, more just and more rational decision-making by governments. While we will also focus on many other themes, this will be our unifying theme.

Required Resources

All mandatory readings will be available on the Course Canvas site.

Recommended Resources

Statutes:

• The Constitution
• Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth)

Books:

• Cheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone, The Oxford Handbook of the Australian Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2018)
• Ron Levy, Hoi Kong, Graeme Orr and Jeff King (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2018)
• Ron Levy, Ian O'Flynn and Hoi Kong, Deliberative Peace Referendums (Oxford University Press, 2021)

Key Journals:

• I-CON (International Journal of Constitutional Law)
• Federal Law Review
• Public Law
• Public Law Review
• Comparative Constitutional Studies

Staff Feedback

Students will be given feedback in the following forms in this course:

• written comments
• verbal comments

Student Feedback

ANU is committed to the demonstration of educational excellence and regularly seeks feedback from students. Students are encouraged to offer feedback directly to their Course Convener or through their College and Course representatives (if applicable). Feedback can also be provided to Course Conveners and teachers via the Student Experience of Learning & Teaching (SELT) feedback program. SELT surveys are confidential and also provide the Colleges and ANU Executive with opportunities to recognise excellent teaching, and opportunities for improvement.

Other Information

Task submission times refer to Canberra time (AEST/AEDT).

Extensions, late submission and penalties: https://law.anu.edu.au/current-students/forms-policy-procedures

Extenuating circumstances: https://www.anu.edu.au/students/program-administration/assessments-exams/extenuating-circumstances-application

Deferred examination: http://www.anu.edu.au/students/program-administration/assessments-exams/deferred-examinations

Penalties for excess word length: https://law.anu.edu.au/word-length-and-excess-word-penalties

Distribution of grades policy: https://law.anu.edu.au/grading

Assessment Reviews and Appeals: https://law.anu.edu.au/assessment-review-and-appeals

Further information about the course: is available from the course Canvas page. Students are required to access the Canvas site regularly throughout the course for any announcements relating to the course.

Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The ANU Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as providing clear guidance on the responsible and ethical use of AI technologies.

The following resources may also be useful:

• The ANU Library's Libguide is a valuable resource for gaining a comprehensive understanding of AI's role in academia.

• The ANU Academic Skills site provides useful information to ensure that you leverage AI responsibly and effectively.

• The ANU Law School Academic Integrity and Misconduct site provides content related to legal implications, ethical guidelines, and considerations when dealing with AI in the context of law.

Class Schedule

Week/Session	Summary of Activities	Assessment
1	Week 1 Seminar 1 (Monday): Partisanship I: Partisanship and ConstitutionsWeek 1 Seminar 2 (Wednesday): Partisanship I: Constitutions and Elections	This week there are 2 lecture-style seminars
2	Week 2 Seminar 1 (Monday): Umpires I: Do Democracies Need Constitutional Umpires?Week 2 Seminar 2 (Wednesday): Umpires II: The Dismissal and the office of the Governor-General	This week there are 2 lecture-style seminars
3	Week 3 Seminar (Monday): Constitutional Change I: The Problem of Constitutional Change in AustraliaWeek 3 Q&A Session (Wednesday)	This week there is (a) 1 lecture-style seminar and (b) 1 structured Q&A session in which students who have signed up for this week discuss their Reading Responses in class.
4	Week 4 Seminar: Constitutional Change II: Deliberative Democracy and Other New Models of Constitutional ChangeWeek 4 Q&A Session (Wednesday)	This week there is (a) 1 lecture-style seminar and (b) 1 structured Q&A session in which students who have signed up for this week discuss their Reading Responses in class.
5	Week 5 Seminar (Monday): Political Parties and the ConstitutionWeek 5 Q&A Session (Wednesday)	This week there is (a) 1 lecture-style seminar and (b) 1 structured Q&A session in which students who have signed up for this week discuss their Reading Responses in class.
6	Week 6 Seminar (Monday): Constitutional Representation of Women and MinoritiesWeek 6 Q&A Session (Wednesday)	This week there is (a) 1 lecture-style seminar and (b) 1 structured Q&A session in which students who have signed up for this week discuss their Reading Responses in class.
7	Week 7 Seminar (Monday): Negative Economic Rights in the ConstitutionWeek 7 Q&A Session (Wednesday)	This week there is (a) 1 lecture-style seminar and (b) 1 structured Q&A session in which students who have signed up for this week discuss their Reading Responses in class.
8	Week 8 Seminar (Monday): Positive Social and Economic Rights in the ConstitutionWeek 8 Q&A Session (Wednesday)	This week there is (a) 1 lecture-style seminar and (b) 1 structured Q&A session in which students who have signed up for this week discuss their Reading Responses in class.
9	Week 9 Seminar (Monday): Money Politics I: Why Regulate Political Money?Week 9 Q&A Session (Wednesday)	This week there is (a) 1 lecture-style seminar and (b) 1 structured Q&A session in which students who have signed up for this week discuss their Reading Responses in class.
10	Week 10 Seminar (Monday): Money Politics II: The Constitutionality of Regulating Political MoneyWeek 10 Q&A Session (Wednesday)	This week there is (a) 1 lecture-style seminar and (b) 1 structured Q&A session in which students who have signed up for this week discuss their Reading Responses in class.
11	Week 11 Seminar (Monday): Constitutions in Deeply Divided Societies and Indigenous-Settler SocietiesWeek 11 Q&A Session (Wednesday)	This week there is (a) 1 lecture-style seminar and (b) 1 structured Q&A session in which students who have signed up for this week discuss their Reading Responses in class.
12	Week 12 Seminar (Monday): Religious Differences and Constitutional FreedomsWeek 12 Q&A Session (Wednesday)	This week there is (a) 1 lecture-style seminar and (b) 1 structured Q&A session in which students who have signed up for this week discuss their Reading Responses in class.

Tutorial Registration

ANU utilises MyTimetable to enable students to view the timetable for their enrolled courses, browse, then self-allocate to small teaching activities / tutorials so they can better plan their time. MyTimetable (MyTT) tutorial allocations are done on a first-come, first-served basis. If you hold a current EAP stating that you require priority selection, you will need to contact the College Student and Education Support team before MyTT opens.

If you are unable to secure a spot in your preferred timeslot, we recommend enrolling in another tutorial and joining the waitlist (indicated by a heart). If spots become available, they are automatically chronologically allocated to those on the waitlist.

Should an activity in MyTT clash with another, please contact the College Student and Education Support team with the course and activity details.

Please note that work commitments will not be considered as a reason for requesting a change to your allocation/s. It is expected that students make themselves available on weekdays for tutorials and seminars.

Assessment Summary

Assessment task	Value	Due Date	Learning Outcomes
Reading Response + Q&A Session	40 %	*	1,2,3,4,5,7
Paper Focus Form	10 %	25/05/2026	1,2,3,4,5,6,7
Law Reform Essay	50 %	28/05/2026	1,2,3,4,5,6,7

* If the Due Date and Return of Assessment date are blank, see the Assessment Tab for specific Assessment Task details

Policies

ANU has educational policies, procedures and guidelines , which are designed to ensure that staff and students are aware of the University’s academic standards, and implement them. Students are expected to have read the Academic Integrity Rule before the commencement of their course. Other key policies and guidelines include:

• Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure
• Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure
• Extenuating Circumstances Application
• Student Surveys and Evaluations
• Deferred Examinations
• Student Complaint Resolution Policy and Procedure
• Code of practice for teaching and learning

Assessment Requirements

The ANU is using Turnitin to enhance student citation and referencing techniques, and to assess assignment submissions as a component of the University's approach to managing Academic Integrity. For additional information regarding Turnitin please visit the Academic Skills website. In rare cases where online submission using Turnitin software is not technically possible; or where not using Turnitin software has been justified by the Course Convener and approved by the Associate Dean (Education) on the basis of the teaching model being employed; students shall submit assessment online via ‘Canvas’ outside of Turnitin, or failing that in hard copy, or through a combination of submission methods as approved by the Associate Dean (Education). The submission method is detailed below.

Moderation of Assessment

Marks that are allocated during Semester are to be considered provisional until formalised by the College examiners meeting at the end of each Semester. If appropriate, some moderation of marks might be applied prior to final results being released.

Participation

• Q&A Session attendance during one week is mandatory. Students will sign up to a given week. Do not miss your week as alternative dates are unlikely to be available.
• Seminar attendance is mandatory only for the 2 weeks you choose to write about. However, students are welcome and encouraged to attend all weeks. Seminar attendance will offer valuable insights into expectations for the final essay.

Examination(s)

There is no final examination for this course.

Assessment Task 1

Reading Response + Q&A Session

Details of this Task:

This is a two-part task:

1. Choose any 2 out of the 14 seminars in the course and write a 1000-word (max.) critical Reading Response before the second seminar you are covering. No further research will be required; the aim is to think and write about the assigned readings and to draw out comparisons, common themes, differences, or any other insights from the two seminars' readings. (Try to cover at least one, but ideally two or more, readings from each seminar.) Your written response is worth 20% of your course mark. Your attendance at each of the 2 seminars is required to receive a mark for this assessment.
2. In addition, sign up for one Q&A Session held during either of the two weeks you are covering. You will attend the Wednesday Q&A session that week in order to answer substantive questions about your Reading Response for about 10 minutes. There is no fixed set of questions; the Q&A will be an organic conversation meant to gauge the depth and breadth of your thinking about your Reading Response. 20% of your course mark will be based on your answers in the Q&A Session. Your attendance at a Q&A Session is mandatory in order to receive this assessment mark.

Notice: This work must have a single central argument (see instructions). It must not be purely descriptive, nor broadly focused without a central argument. A how-to guide for this assignment will be posted on Canvas.

Nature of Task: Compulsory and non-redeemable. Failure to submit this assessment will result in a mark of zero for this assessment task.

Weighting: 40% overall (Part 1 - 20% + Part 2 - 20%)

Word Limit: Strictly 1000 words max. Footnotes are not included in the word count; however, footnotes must only include references.The ANU Law School excess word penalty policy can be found here. Assessments must be submitted in a word processing file format (.doc, .docx). PDF files are not acceptable.

Referencing: AGLC4 referencing is required. Any source that you rely on or quote must be cited (except class discussions). To allow for an accurate word count, please do not include a title page or bibliography/reference list and please only submit Word files.

Integrity and AI Policy: AI-generated writing is not permitted. (In this course we will work to hone your writing skills.) Please familiarise yourself with all plagiarism and AI policies here.

Due Date: Your Reading Response is due at 5pm Sunday of the second week you have chosen. Late submission (without an extension) is permitted, although late penalties will apply. Due to the nature of this task, late submission with or without an extension is discouraged; if you anticipate being unable to submit a Response in a given week on time, it is best to choose a different week. However, you may apply for an extension if required.

Estimated Return Date: Within two weeks of submission.

Assessment Criteria:

A) The Reading Response should primarily reflect thoughtful engagement with readings. Main marking criteria for Reading Responses (equally weighted):

1.   Evidence of understanding of readings chosen for the Reading Response;

2.   Response is focused around a single, specific argument;

3.   Clarity and care of expression. Follow the Good Writing Guide posted on Canvas.

B) The Q&A Session should primarily show the student's engagement with and logical thinking the readings. Main marking criteria for Q&A Sessions (equally weighted):

1.   Evidence of understanding the readings chosen for the Reading Response;

2.   Ability to identify the single, specific argument presented in the Reading Response and to answer questions about why the student chose this argument;

3.   Ability to answer miscellaneous questions testing depth of understanding of the topic and argument.

Assessment Task 2

Paper Focus Form

Details of Task: For this Paper Focus Form assignment (AT2), students will choose a topic and do some preliminary readings for their final Law Reform Paper (AT3). The Form will have several fields such as 'Title', 'Topic', 'Single, Narrow Argument' (ie central thesis), 'Structure of Paper' and 'Expected Readings', which the student will fill in while relying on the Law Reform Paper Instructions posted on Canvas. The Law Reform Paper Instructions (as well as a 19-minute video posted on Echo) will especially help students to formulate a topic and 'Single, Narrow Argument'. The Law Reform Paper Instructions will also suggest various topics. More information on both AT2 and AT3 will be available on Canvas.

Nature of Task: Compulsory and non-redeemable. Failure to submit this assessment will result in a mark of zero for this assessment task.

Weighting: 10%

Word Limit: Strictly 250 words max. The short word count is intended to help you be very concise and clear about what you plan to write. Do not exceed the word limit. Footnotes are not included in the word count; however, footnotes must only include references. The ANU Law School excess word penalty policy can be found here. Assessment must be submitted in a word processing file format (.doc, .docx). PDF files are not acceptable.)

Estimated Return Date: Within two weeks of submission.

Integrity and AI Policy: AI-generated writing is not permitted. (In this course we will work to hone your writing skills.) Please familiarise yourself with all plagiarism and AI policies here.

Referencing: AGLC4 referencing is required. Any source that you rely on or quote must be cited (except class discussions). To allow for an accurate word count, please do not include a title page or bibliography/reference list and please only submit Word files.

Due Date: Students can submit this assignment any time during the Semester, but no later than 5:00 pm, Monday 25 May 2026 (Week 12). The sooner the Paper Focus Form is submitted, the sooner you will receive useful feedback for your final paper. Students who wish to receive feedback before the midway point of the course should submit the Paper Focus Form no later than 5:00 pm, Monday 22 March 2026 (Week 5).

NB: If an extension is required for the Law Reform Essay, a separate application must also be submitted for the Paper Focus Form.

Late submission (without an extension) is permitted, although late penalties will apply.

Please be aware that if you are in your final course(s), any late submissions may delay your conferral date.

 Estimated Return Date:

• Submissions received Weeks 1–11: feedback returned within 1–2 weeks.
• Submissions received Week 12: feedback returned at the conclusion of the semester.

Assessment Criteria: This assignment is intended to help you craft your paper and therefore marking is not strict. Instead of strict judgment of your work at this stage, you will receive concrete and constructive advice about the substantive direction of your final Law Reform Paper. This assignment is intended to be helpful and low-stress. Good efforts to formulate a Law Reform Paper topic and 'single, focused argument', while following instructions Law Reform Paper instructions, will receive robust marks.

Assessment Task 3

Law Reform Essay

Details of Task: This assignment will involve you selecting an area of the law covered in the course, researching the current law and alternative models, and arguing for or against adopting an alternative model or retaining the status quo. A list of topic options will be distributed before classes begin, along with a suggested reading to get you started. Students may also opt to write on a topic of their own choosing, but must check with the convenor about the topic’s suitability. This task relates to all seven of your intended learning outcomes; however, it is particularly relevant to #6 (‘research with some independence to produce [an essay] on a sub-topic of constitutional law relevant to themes covered in the course’) and #7 (communication). An ‘Essay Guide’ document will be available on Canvas. This assignment can serve as the 'Capstone' research essay towards your degree.

Nature of Task: Compulsory and non-redeemable. Failure to submit this assessment will result in a mark of zero for this assessment task.

Weighting: 50%

Word Limit: 3500 words (max). If counting as a capstone, 4000 (max) words. Footnotes are not included in the word count; however, footnotes must only include citations.The ANU Law School excess word penalty policy can be found here. Assessment must be submitted in a word processing file format (.doc, .docx). PDF files are not acceptable.)

Referencing: AGLC4 referencing required. Any source that you rely on or quote must be cited (except class discussions). To make getting an accurate word count easy, please do not include a title page or bibliography/reference list and please only submit Word files. (Deductions of up to 1/100 apply for each fault.)

Release: An 'Essay Guide' document will be made available on Canvas before classes begin.

Due Date: 5pm, Thursday 28 May 2026, via Turnitin. Late submissions (without an extension) are permitted, but late penalties will apply. Please be aware that if you are in your final course(s), any late submissions may delay your conferral date.

Estimated Return date: Official end of semester results release date.

Integrity and AI Policy: AI-based reasoning and writing are not permitted. (In this course we will work to hone your writing skills.) However, AI may be used (sparingly) as an initial research aid. Any AI research must be verified to avoid faulty 'hallucinations'. Work for which signficant AI writing or hallucinations are detected will require follow-up viva (in-person questioning), without access to notes. Please familiarise yourself with all plagiarism and AI policies here.

Assessment Criteria: The three general criteria (described in greater detail in the Rubrics) are:

1.   Evidence of knowledge of the subject and of any relevant themes from lectures/seminars;

2.   Depth of analysis (centered around a single, narrow argument that is clearly identified);

3.   Clarity and care of expression. Follow the Good Writing Guide posted on Canvas.

Academic Integrity

Academic integrity is a core part of the ANU culture as a community of scholars. The University’s students are an integral part of that community. The academic integrity principle commits all students to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support, academic integrity, and to uphold this commitment by behaving honestly, responsibly and ethically, and with respect and fairness, in scholarly practice.

The University expects all staff and students to be familiar with the academic integrity principle, the Academic Integrity Rule 2021, the Policy: Student Academic Integrity and Procedure: Student Academic Integrity, and to uphold high standards of academic integrity to ensure the quality and value of our qualifications.

The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 is a legal document that the University uses to promote academic integrity, and manage breaches of the academic integrity principle. The Policy and Procedure support the Rule by outlining overarching principles, responsibilities and processes. The Academic Integrity Rule 2021 commences on 1 December 2021 and applies to courses commencing on or after that date, as well as to research conduct occurring on or after that date. Prior to this, the Academic Misconduct Rule 2015 applies.

 

The University commits to assisting all students to understand how to engage in academic work in ways that are consistent with, and actively support academic integrity. All coursework students must complete the online Academic Integrity Module (Epigeum), and Higher Degree Research (HDR) students are required to complete research integrity training. The Academic Integrity website provides information about services available to assist students with their assignments, examinations and other learning activities, as well as understanding and upholding academic integrity.

Online Submission

You will be required to electronically sign a declaration as part of the submission of your assignment. Please keep a copy of the assignment for your records. You must ensure that you upload the correct document on the specified submission due date and time. Any document modified after the due date and time will either incur a late penalty or will NOT be accepted. Unless an exemption has been approved by the Associate Dean (Education), submission must be through Turnitin in a word processing file format (.doc, .docx). Electronic copies in .pdf file format are not acceptable.

Hardcopy Submission

For some forms of assessment (hand written assignments, art works, laboratory notes, etc.) hard copy submission is appropriate when approved by the Associate Dean (Education). Hard copy submissions must utilise the Assignment Cover Sheet. Please keep a copy of tasks completed for your records.

Late Submission

Individual assessment tasks may or may not allow for late submission. Policy regarding late submission is detailed below:

• Late submission not permitted. If submission of assessment tasks without an extension after the due date is not permitted, a mark of 0 will be awarded.
• Late submission permitted. Late submission of assessment tasks without an extension are penalised at the rate of 5% of the possible marks available per working day or part thereof. Late submission of assessment tasks is not accepted after 10 working days after the due date, or on or after the date specified in the course outline for the return of the assessment item.
• Late submission is not accepted for tests or examinations.
• Late submission with an extension. To ensure equity for all students, the 5% penalty per working day for late submission of work does not apply if you have been granted an extension. Where an extension is granted, the revised due date and submission time will be provided in writing. Importantly, any revised due date is inclusive of weekends and public holidays. Regardless of which day of the week the revised due date falls on, students who submit after that date will be penalised by 5% of the possible marks available for the task per 24-hour period.

Referencing Requirements

The Academic Skills website has information to assist you with your writing and assessments. The website includes information about Academic Integrity including referencing requirements for different disciplines. There is also information on Plagiarism and different ways to use source material. Any use of artificial intelligence must be properly referenced. Failure to properly cite use of Generative AI will be considered a breach of academic integrity.

Returning Assignments

All marks and feedback will be provided by the return date listed in the class summary.

Extensions and Penalties

Extensions and late submission of assessment pieces are covered by the Student Assessment (Coursework) Policy and Procedure. Extensions may be granted for assessment pieces that are not examinations or take-home examinations. If you need an extension, you must request an extension in writing on or before the due date. If you have documented and appropriate medical evidence that demonstrates you were not able to request an extension on or before the due date, you may be able to request it after the due date.

Resubmission of Assignments

• Maximum Submissions: Students can submit up to three times per assessment.
• Final Submission Counts: Only the last uploaded version will be marked — provided it is uploaded before marking begins.
• Late Submissions: If submitted after the due date, the final version will still be marked, but late penalties will apply (unless an extension has been approved).
• No Submissions After Return Date: Once the return-of-assessment date has passed, NO submissions will be accepted.
• Marking Already Started: If a marker has already begun marking a version, that version will be the one assessed — even if a newer one is uploaded later.

Privacy Notice

The ANU has made a number of third party, online, databases available for students to use. Use of each online database is conditional on student end users first agreeing to the database licensor’s terms of service and/or privacy policy. Students should read these carefully. In some cases student end users will be required to register an account with the database licensor and submit personal information, including their: first name; last name; ANU email address; and other information.
In cases where student end users are asked to submit ‘content’ to a database, such as an assignment or short answers, the database licensor may only use the student’s ‘content’ in accordance with the terms of service – including any (copyright) licence the student grants to the database licensor. Any personal information or content a student submits may be stored by the licensor, potentially offshore, and will be used to process the database service in accordance with the licensors terms of service and/or privacy policy.
If any student chooses not to agree to the database licensor’s terms of service or privacy policy, the student will not be able to access and use the database. In these circumstances students should contact their lecturer to enquire about alternative arrangements that are available.

Distribution of grades policy

Academic Quality Assurance Committee monitors the performance of students, including attrition, further study and employment rates and grade distribution, and College reports on quality assurance processes for assessment activities, including alignment with national and international disciplinary and interdisciplinary standards, as well as qualification type learning outcomes.

Since first semester 1994, ANU uses a grading scale for all courses. This grading scale is used by all academic areas of the University.

Support for students

The University offers students support through several different services. You may contact the services listed below directly or seek advice from your Course Convener, Student Administrators, or your College and Course representatives (if applicable).

• ANU Health, safety & wellbeing for medical services, counselling, mental health and spiritual support
• ANU Accessibility for students with a disability or ongoing or chronic illness
• ANU Dean of Students for confidential, impartial advice and help to resolve problems between students and the academic or administrative areas of the University
• ANU Academic Skills supports you make your own decisions about how you learn and manage your workload.
• ANU Counselling promotes, supports and enhances mental health and wellbeing within the University student community.
• ANUSA supports and represents all ANU students